Arguing the toss at the end of a lease
By Peter Scott | Property Lease Negotiation | Tuesday 20th November 2012
This is my second blog about the new building surveyor profession in New Zealand. It is having a significant impact on the way building owners are managing commercial leases.
I’ve written before about how easy it is for a business to get caught out at the end of a lease by the ‘make good‘ provisions that require a property to be reinstated to how it was at the beginning of a lease.
We hear so much these days about the benefits of collaboration and cooperation, but often it is the theory and not the practice we hear about.
The first thing to realise when you are about to enter into a lease for a commercial property is that there is no such thing as a standard contract.
Ratchet clauses in commercial property leases are something tenants love to hate.
I’m predicting the commercial tenancy market is about to become a bloody battlefield as times get really tough for investors and landlords managing commercial property portfolios.
The commercial rental property market in New Zealand continues to be very much a tenant’s market… but there are many landlords who simply don’t get it.
You’ve heard the phrase “stating the obvious”. But when it comes to lease agreements it is interesting to consider how often we haven’t done just that; state the obvious.